Online Arguments - And we are talking about Football

Twitter Argument  

And this is Football we are talking about 

If you want to explore this debate the link above the image will take you to the twitter page. However, I did include a screenshot of one of the many arguments that are happening every second. 

The reason I choose this argument is because of all the chaos that is happening with Beaver Football and conferences and just the NCAA in general. 

While this argument is not about Beaver Football, it is about The SEC. 

Kirk is basically saying what ESPN wants him to say - which is complete love for the SEC and Desmond is speaking is mind, even if that means going against ESPN and the SEC. 

There is a battle of truth within this argument and it is triggering for people. 

One concern I have is how much power the SEC has. People are willing to defend the conference no matter what (Kirk would be an example of this) 

Another concern is how open people are on twitter. This is just part of a larger argument and if you follow twitter threads it is insane how deep these arguments go, even over football.

My final concern is about Desmond - he was speaking his truth and now his job is at risk. 

People have every right to defend what they love, but people need to recognize that logic can't go out the window. 

If I could develop 5 rules regarding online communication:

1) Knowledge what the other person is saying

2) Admit when you are wrong 

3) Use calm language - no need to escalate things with vulgar language

4) Defend your argument with facts, not just feelings  

5) Get some 3rd party input 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knapps Relationship Model

Image
The Knapp's relationship model helps analyze the different stages people are at in their relationships. There are two maintenance models: coming together and coming a part. Based on this there are several levels or stages you may be at depending on the relationship you are analyzing. I am going to talk about my boyfriend. I would say that we are at the integration stage. We are very comfortable with one another and most people know we are dating. However, it is interesting to see how our relationship has followed the Knapps Model overtime. Our initiation stage was brief - this is when I introduced myself. Followed by the experimentation stage - this is when we discovered we were compatible and had similar values. Then there is the intensifying stage - this is when you continue to get to know each other on a deeper level.  I would say the the Knapps model is fairly accurate and can be used for many types of relationships. 
Read more

How to Shine Online and Excel at Virtual Communication

Image
 Think Fast Talk Smart Podcast  The podcast linked above is a game changer when it comes to online communication!  The tips below are from the episode 'How to shine Online and Excel at Virtual Communication'  How to maintain focus when communication/presenting online? How do you stay relevant? - Make a connection - Ask viewers how they are doing to establish a connection immediately. - Fill the screen with your face and upper body - This helps the audience focus  - Don't underestimate the power of good lightening  -Make sure camera is at eye level this gives the allusion of 'eye contact'  -"The background your interviewer sees needs to look as professional as possible. A cluttered space is a strike against you before you even open your mouth. "You'll be painting a picture of a disorganized person who lets things pile up," says Bill Horne of  William Warren Consulting . (Week 5 learning materials) How to keep the audience engaged?  - Every 10-...
Read more

The Toulmin Method

Image
  The Toulmin method helps evaluate arguments and navigate online communication systems . This method helps to break down information that may be complex or involve emotions, making understanding the text difficult to comprehend . The first item that is evaluated is the claim , what is the main point? Most forms of online communication will have a claim, this could be in the form of a social media post, article, or paper. Additionally, it is importnat to look for data that will support the claim being made. This could look like statistics or outside sources. Furthermore, the warrant is what connects the data to the claim, this helps explain why the data is relevant. Additional support may be necessary as well, this is called backing , when you use another online source to reinforce your main point or data. The qualifier is used to highlight limitations in the claim. It is important to recognize other points that may be importnat, even if they don't directly support your c...
Read more